Yes, Gold Is An Alternative Form Of Money

Few assets confuse and confound the average investor as much as gold. But there’s an easy solution for cutting through the noise and thinking rationally about how the metal can fit into a broader asset allocation strategy: It’s money and should be treated as such.

Depending on your perspective, the world’s favorite precious metal is also considered in some circles as a hedge against chaos, protection from inflation and a general source of financial comfort. Some also use it as a speculative vehicle with time horizons measured in minutes, days or weeks. Another school of thought sees gold as one more risk asset that deserves to be considered in the same breath as stocks. At times it’s all (or sometimes none) of those things. But I prefer to think of it as money, which is the main takeaway over long sweeps of financial history.

There was a time when gold was formally used as money by the US and other governments. Those days are long gone, but the metal’s lengthy, evolving history as coin of the realm lives on, if only in the collective minds of investors and financial markets. We can debate about whether that’s reasonable or practical, but it’s a simple fact that dates to at least the Roman Empire.

For ill or good, much of the world considers gold to be a liquid asset. True, you can’t buy a loaf of bread or rent an apartment with it, short of tortured negotiations. But compared with every other commodity or non-currency asset on the planet, gold is the closest thing to “money” that’s immune to government control. Simply put: no one worries that you’ll have a problem liquidating your gold hoard at a fair, widely traded price in the world’s financial centers (and beyond).

To be fair, bitcoin and other crypto currencies are the new kids on the block that arguably offer the capacity to out-gold gold as alternative forms of money. But there are reasons to be skeptical. In the interest of brevity I’ll sidestep this debate here, other than to note that these are still very early days for deciding if the likes of bitcoin will replace gold’s millennia-long run as a store of value. Centuries of history aren’t easily or persuasively overturned with a track record that effectively launches with the start of the Obama administration.

Critics will rightly point out that gold, like bitcoin, is volatile in the short term and so its value as money is weak if your time horizon doesn’t extend beyond a few years. Agreed, and so on that basis you’ll have to look elsewhere for a “safe” asset.

But let’s also recognize that however you define “money,” there will be a unique set of pros and cons to your preference. Meanwhile, gold’s history as an alternative, if flawed, form of money is convincing as a possible addition to your “cash” allocation.

Consider, for instance, how gold performs against its arch fiat rival: the US dollar. Notably, gold and the greenback tend to be negatively correlated. When one rises, the other tends to weaken, and vice versa, as the chart below shows (based on history starting in 2010). That’s exactly what you’d expect to see from an alternative to US currency in the forex space.

Another test of gold’s claim to be an alternate, albeit informal currency: it keep’s pace and tends to outperform short-term US Treasuries, a cash proxy. Using 2010 as a start date, it’s clear that an investment in SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) – an ETF that holds bullion – has outperformed iShares Short Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) by a wide margin.

Granted, over shorter periods GLD suffers sharp losses compared with SHV’s relatively stable pricing. Again, gold’s short-term volatility is a major drawback for investors looking for stability in the near term.

But if you have a 10-year-plus horizon, history suggests that gold will likely keep pace and perhaps outperform Treasury bills. The longer the horizon, the higher gold’s advantage, albeit with roller-coaster-like volatility in the shorter term.

Should gold be part of your asset allocation? Minds will differ, but to the extent that gold is held the “safest” reasoning is that it’s an alternative form of money that compliments and diversifies “cash” holdings.

Alas, gold shares one common feature that applies to every asset class: there are no guarantees. But if you use history as a guide on matters of investment choices, gold’s track record is striking. Namely, it’s outlasted every formal currency in history and outperformed most in the interim.

Learn To Use R For Portfolio Analysis
Quantitative Investment Portfolio Analytics In R:
An Introduction To R For Modeling Portfolio Risk and Return

By James Picerno

2 thoughts on “Yes, Gold Is An Alternative Form Of Money

  1. Craig jackson

    Gold is a good store for your wealth when other stores aren’t functioning properly. Warren Buffet never liked gold because he stated correctly that he could always find companies where people made profits that dwarfed gold’s expected return. As long as we have an economy where that’s true, gold will be unattractive. The day may come when economic or political problems make high profits much more difficult to achieve. That’s when you want gold.

  2. Louis Woodhill

    Gold owners/investors should pray that Vivek Ramaswamy does not become president. His plan to require the Fed to stabilize general commodity prices would cause the dollar price of gold to fall to no more than $500 oz. and perhaps as low as $100/oz.

Comments are closed.