Monthly Archives: September 2006

A WARNING FROM JOE

Reading this morning’s update on August personal income and outlays raises new questions about consumer habits for 2007. And that, in turn, raises questions about the economic outlook.
The first inquiry will center once again on Joe Sixpack’s capacity for spending in the new year. Granted, it’s a little early to be weighing what will come in 2007, although it’s never too early to worry about what’s just beyond the horizon. On that front, consider the chart below, which compares monthly changes in personal income with personal spending.
092906.GIF
As you can see, August wasn’t kind to those who think Joe’s oblivious to the concept that income is finite and spending is, in theory, can be a black hole. There are many things that can change between now and the end of the year, but for the moment it’s clear that it’s time to rethink a world where consumer spending flies upward forever more.
To put a numerical face on the point, here’s the sobering fact du jour: last month’s advance in personal consumption expenditures was a thin 0.1%, the slowest since last November’s 0.05%. There’s no joy with personal income either, with August’s 0.3% rise also posting the weakest since November 2005.
Adding insult to injury, personal saving was a negative $45 billion last month too, continuing the long-running line of monthly red ink on this measure.
Nonetheless, the optimists say that a rebound will reveal itself once September’s report on income and outlays is published next month. The rationale for keeping a stiff upper lip is that the tumble in energy prices this month will give Joe and his counterparts new incentive to revive spending–an incentive that was sorely lacking during August’s relatively high price of fuel.
Joe may be battered, but he’s not down yet. Hope, in other words, is alive, even if it’s not exactly kicking today.

THE VIEW FROM 29,000 FEET (AGAIN)

It’s higher than the initial advance estimate (just barely) but considerably lower than the second guess. But no matter how you wish to interpret today’s third and final measure of second-quarter GDP, there’s no getting around the fact that the general trend with economic measures broad and narrow of late is down.
The real, annualized increase in GDP was 2.6% during April through June, the government reported, down from 5.6% in the first quarter. The fact that there’s a slowdown in our midst is old news. The bigger question is what investors should do, if anything? In search of an answer, everyone starts with the same handicap: ignorance about what’s coming. That, as they say, is the nature of risk.
The first step in mitigating that risk is diversification. The devil, of course, is in the details. With that in mind, we direct you to the dark angel’s scorecard. As always, it’s heavy on offering clarity about what’s already passed and silent on the morrow….
092806.GIF

ASYMMETRICAL EXPECTATIONS

The stock market has been shrugging off recent signs of weakness in the economy and the bond market has been embracing the trend. One market is wrong; one is right. We have a suspicion about which is which, but then again if we really knew what was going to happen we’d sell everything, leverage our portfolio to the sky, and put it all on the winning asset class. Alas, we’re not quite sure what’s lurking around the corner, and so concentrated bets in a single asset class remain the stuff of dreams in a world where limited knowledge and surprise prevails.
Diversification, in other words, is the only game in town for mere mortals with imperfect insight into the future. But as compelling as multi-asset class investing is, sometimes it’s perplexing, and now is one of those times.
Both stocks and bonds have been running higher. Both markets have access to the same data, and both are drawing different conclusions.
Let’s start with the bond market, where the benchmark 10-year Treasury yield has dipped below 4.6% for the first time since February. In fact, the 10-year yield has been on a slippery slope for since July, when a 5.2% current yield prevailed early in the month. The catalyst for the decline is, of course, the ongoing stream of economic reports that show the economy is slowing. (The latest is this morning’s update on new orders for durable goods, which tumbled for the second straight month in August–the first back-to-back tumble in more than two years.)
The stock market swims in the same data pool as the bond market and yet equities have run higher in recent weeks. In fact, yesterday’s jump in equities brought the S&P 500 to its highest level in more than five years.
The fact that bonds and stocks are moving in the same direction may be frustrating for strategic investors looking for more independence from the two major asset classes. In fact, correlations go through cycles. As the chart below illustrates, correlations between the S&P 500 and the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond index have been rising since bottoming out in 2003 and 2004. Even so, measuring correlation by trailing 36-month periods shows that the diversification kick born of holding stocks and bonds is battered but far from dead. For the three years through last month, equities and fixed income still had a slightly negative correlation. (For the chart, 1.0 is perfect correlation, 0.0 is no correlation, and -1.0 is perfect negative correlation for performance.)
092706.GIF
There’s a fundamental reason why owning both stocks and bonds has served as the foundation for a diversified portfolio over time: each asset class is driven by different trends. Sometimes those trends converge, in which case equities and fixed income march together. But such symmetry never lasts, and over time tends to be the exception. As such, we see the future bringing more asymmetry into the relationship between stocks and bonds. The only question is which asset class will blink first? We can afford to remain agnostic on the answer in part because we own some of each asset class. Diversification has its rewards, even if they’re not always obvious in the short run.

SHELTER FROM THE STORM

Even the darkest cloud may conceal a silver lining. Or so the optimists say.
The example du jour comes by way of yesterday’s report on existing home sales for August. On the surface, there’s precious little to celebrate. If you were already bearish on the economy, the news that sales dropped 0.5% last month from July, and are down 12.6% from a year ago, according to National Association of Realtors (NAR), won’t do much to change your vision.
Nor will the year-over-year comparisons: the median sales price dropped last month from a year ago–the first annual drop in 11 years. Another troubling trend: the rapid rise in inventory: the supply of homes for sale in August was up nearly 38% from 12 months previous.
But context is everything if you’re searching for the sunny side of the street. Are you inclined to see the glass half full or half empty? Depending on your answer, you can see what you want to see by tweaking the perspective and emphasizing this and de-emphasizing that. The art of statistics offers a world of opportunity for the ambitious analyst.
Consider, for instance, that while existing home sales were down last month, placed in the context of the trend in recent years the latest numbers don’t look all that bad. David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, has an eye for seeing the positive, and said so in the press release accompanying yesterday’s update. “After a stronger-than-expected drop in July, the fairly even sales numbers in August tell us the market is at a more sustainable pace,” he said. “It keeps us on track to see the third highest sales year on record, but we do expect an adjustment in home prices to last several months as we work through a build up in the inventory of homes on the market.”
There’s also reason to think that the future could deliver some positive surprises born of mortgage rates that are again falling. The national average rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage was 6.52 percent in August, down from 6.76 percent in July, according to NAR’s press release. And last week, the 30-year fixed dropped to 6.40 percent.
“I think the worst of the drops [in existing home sales] are probably behind us, but it is way too early to say that we are at the bottom,” Mark Vitner, senior economist with Wachovia bank, told Reuters via ABC News.
Some optimists also note that while the median sales price of existing homes slipped over a 12-month period for the first time in more than a decade last month, prices in the West actually rose slightly vs. August 2005. But there are limits to walking in the sun and feeling warm and fuzzy about the future. NAR’s Lereah said the Western shoe could soon drop. “In California I think prices are going to have to come down harder,” he advised Reuters via the L.A. Times.
You can be anything you want to be in the 21st century–bull, bear, or something in between. Being right, alas, isn’t getting any easier.

THE GREAT DEBATE, FRESHLY (RE)BREWED FOR ANOTHER WEEK OF FUN

The economy may be slowing, but the accumulating evidence doesn’t convince every last analyst that the future will bring a stumble.
At the leading edge of contrarian thinking on where the economy’s headed is one dismal scientist who thinks the consensus is wrong and headed for a train wreck. Bonds are “riding for a fall — the economy isn’t weakening and the Fed’s not going to ease,” wrote David Gitlitz, chief economist at TrendMacrolytics, in a note to clients last Thursday.
The bond market paid no attention, opting instead the next day to rally and dropped the 10-year Treasury yield to under 4.6% for the first time since February. The message could hardly be more direct. The inversion of the yield curve now amounts to Fed funds at roughly 65 basis points above the 10-year. As inversions go, this one’s fairly solid and so its forecast can neither be misconstrued or accidental. That doesn’t make it right, but one can’t claim the signal was unclear.
But if a recession is now baked into the system, Gitlitz reminds that reasonable minds can look at the same data and come to wildly different conclusions.
Speaking on the opposite side of the analytical aisle is Nouriel Roubini of Roubini Global Economics. He warned on his blog last week that a “hard landing and recession” are now a 70% probability. Among the highlights (or low points) of his forecast:
* The economy will sharply decelerate in H2 (1.5% growth in Q3 and 0% by Q4)
* The housing market will experience its biggest bust in decades and home prices will sharply fall
* The US will enter into a recession by Q1 of 2007
Gitlitz isn’t entertaining anything even remotely close to Roubini’s vision. On the notion of a housing bust, for instance, he counters that the recent decline in mortgage rates might “ease the housing slump upon which rests so much of the bond market’s hopes for broader economic deterioration.” And when it comes to the yield-curve inversion, the traditional reading may not be relevant, he continues:

It’s true that significant inversions over the past two decades have correctly anticipated subsequent Fed rate cuts. But it’s also true that on those occasions policy was far tighter than it is now. The 2000 inversion came when the Fed pushed the real funds rate to 4%, with a 6.5% nominal rate against core inflation running at about 2.5% year-on-year. In 1989, the real rate got as high as 5%, with the Fed’s hikes topping out at 9.75%. By contrast, the current 5.25% funds rate amounts to a real rate of less than 2.5%. Rather than being tight, the Fed remains accommodative.

The bottom line for Gitlitz: “We don’t believe the Fed will ease without a precipitous growth slump, and we see no indication that such a slowdown is in the works.”
The Fed’s FOMC meets again on October 24 and 25 to again consider the right and proper level of money’s price. So far, the Gitlitz view of the world finds little support in the world of futures trading. As we write this morning, the November Fed funds contract is priced in anticipation of holding the Fed funds at the current 5.25%.
Then again, bulls and bears may both claim triumph if the pause remains intact at the next rate meeting. If the Fed truly thought a recession was coming, it would cut rates, right? On the other hand, some might reason that the Fed is worried that growth will stay stronger than expected and so prefers to keep rates unchanged for fear of cutting too early.
Perhaps, but for the moment the forces expecting economic moderation are in control, an influence that extends to the world of oil. A barrel of crude fell below $60 earlier today, a six-month low. When and if Mr. Market comes around to the Gitlitz view of the economy, oil prices are likely to be an early indicator. But today, at least, the slow-growth outlook prevails.
For the long-term strategic investor, the economic debate can be more than a little confusing. No matter, as we’re still of a mind that better opportunities will emerge down the road, and so we’re still overweighted in cash. At some point, valuations in one or more of the asset classes will present more compelling numbers. Meantime, we’re happy to stay diversified across all the usual suspects, albeit without making aggressive bets anywhere. That will change, perhaps soon. But first, Gitlitz or Roubini must be proven wrong, a task that can only be delivered by the data.
Our suspicion is that the future will favor something closer to Roubini’s outlook, if not quite so extreme. Nonetheless, the optimist in us still hopes for a scenario that tracks Gitlitz’s. Call us crazy, but we prefer growth over recession. Nonetheless, we’ll take what comes. More importantly, we aim to profit from it. Such is life in the cold, calculating and opportunistic trenches.

THE GREENSPAN FACTOR MAKES A TIMELY RETURN

The 10-year Treasury yield continued tumbling yesterday, falling below 4.6%, the lowest since late-February. The general catalyst: mounting worries about an economic slowdown. But yesterday’s buying spree in bonds also found some unexpected support from the Greenspan effect.
Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan reportedly made comments Thursday evening about the prospects for a Fed rate cut, according to the Wall Street Journal. Rumors of the talk, delivered at a conference at Drake Management in New York, apparently inspired a fair amount of the buying yesterday that pushed yields lower (bond yields and prices move inversely). Nonetheless, there’s some debate about what exactly Greenspan said on Thursday. The complete Journal story (available only to subscribers) notes that “two people who attended the event where Mr. Greenspan spoke said he didn’t say anything about likely actions by the Fed, as some rumors suggested.”
Nonetheless, rumors are a potent force these days as questions swirl about what comes next for the economy. Nature abhors a vacuum, and so do bond traders. Ours is a moment when buying Treasuries first and asking questions later is the preference du jour. The fad will continue until (and if) there’s compelling evidence to rethink the trade. Meanwhile, momentum is alive and kicking (again).

ANATOMY OF A SLOWDOWN

The debate over whether the economy is slowing is dead. In fact, it’s appears to have been deceased for some time. Some of us may not have realized this essential fact, but the discussion of relevance has necessarily turned to the magnitude of the decline.
The latest batch of numbers confirm what the bond market has been predicting for some time: economic momentum is slowing, and more than a little. The accumulated numbers below tell the story. Of particular interest is the Philadelphia Fed index, which tracks manufacturing activity in New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware. The latest report shows that the index went negative for the first time in three years, and by a surprisingly wide margin from the previous number. Meanwhile, the Conference Board’s leading index fell again by 0.2%, bringing the measure to its lowest since October 2005.
092206.GIFstill appears intact, equities are vulnerable to a larger correction going forward. Much, of course, depends on the economic reports coming next week, which will inform Wall Street as to just how much the economy is slowing.
Indeed, next week is stuffed with scheduled releases of new numbers that could take a toll on equities. Among the highlights:
* Existing Home Sales (Sep 25, 10 a.m.)
* Consumer Confidence (Sep 26, 10 a.m.)
* Durable Goods Orders (Sep 27, 8:30 a.m.)
* 2Q GDP, final (Sep 28, 8:30 a.m.)
* Personal Income & Spending (Sep 29, 8:30 a.m.)
The slowing U.S. economy, in fact, seems to have company. BCA Research on Wednesday, citing a survey of analyst expectations on the global economy, reports that a continued slowdown is widely forecast.
The good news is that when cycles turn, volatility in prices in asset classes tends to rise as the markets struggle to digest the shift in trend. Traditionally, such periods produce attractive buying opportunities for strategic-minded investors.
Indeed, such opportunities have been notably lacking this year. Virtually all of the asset classes have been priced for perfection as it relates to their particular slice of the world. But something less than perfection is starting to arrive, and the repricing of risk in more than a subtle manner may have started. For those with the cash at the ready, the future may extend deals that are too good to pass up. If so, that alone would mark a considerable change from the recent past.
Of course, an enlightened investor must realize that if the economy slows, but by a degree that still manages to surprise on the upside, stocks could rally and bonds could suffer. Everything is relative when it comes to the link between prices and expectations. That’s why the financial gods invented diversification. Nonetheless, redeploying capital across asset classes when expected returns rise, even on the margins, is the only game in town in the long run.

IN PERFECTION WE TRUST

There’s a higher degree of respect today for the old saying: Don’t fight the Fed.
In Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s first six months on the job, such counsel was thought to be of fading relevance. But the chairman’s verbal stumbles are gone while the Fed’s credibility is higher, thanks to Bernanke and company’s forecast that a slowing economy would complement lower inflation. So far, that prediction has proved to be accurate, and Wall Street couldn’t be happier.
In fact, yesterday’s decision by the central bank to hold Fed funds at 5.25% was widely expected. Fed funds futures have been predicting another pause for weeks.
But this new world order of respect for the institution that ultimately controls inflation’s path is contingent, as always, on what happens next. From an investor’s perspective, the future holds more than a few challenges, and perhaps some volatility in pricing because expectations in the present are fairly high and rising.
Investors seem inclined to believe that the so-called Goldilocks economy is assured–not too hot and not too cold. In this vision of future bliss, economic growth will slow enough to keep interest rates from rising, but growth will not tumble so much as to bring on a recession. Meanwhile, inflation will moderate to just the right level to stave off deflation while giving the Fed room to continue pausing and perhaps even begin cutting rates.
In a world where the yield curve is inverted, expecting perfection may be asking for more than the financial gods can deliver. A three-month T-bill currently yields 4.92%, about 20 basis points above the rate on a 10-year Treasury. Then again, perhaps this is the international signal that perfection is coming in economic and financial spheres. One has to keep an open mind in the new world order, even if we’re keeping one hand on our wallets.
In any case, jubilation dominates trading in stocks and bonds. The S&P 500 yesterday on an intraday basis probed heights last witnessed in February 2001, while the 10-year yield yesterday briefly dipped to its lowest (~4.71%) since March.
Some of the buying is inspired by the correction in commodities, notably energy. With the froth coming out of prices for oil, gasoline and natural gas recently, the money is being redeployed in stocks and bonds.
But amid all the euphoria that’s now sweeping Wall Street, it’s worth remembering that the Fed still has work to do. The core rate of inflation still remains too high to ignore. Meanwhile, labor costs seem to be perking up, delivering what may turn out to be a headache for monetary policy in the near future.
“All the wage data show an acceleration to one degree or another yet the policy makers do not acknowledge that” in yesterday’s FOMC statement, Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com, told the New York Times today. “That is suggestive of a more dovish Federal Reserve. The small changes in this latest statement all suggest that the Fed will not be raising interest rates anytime soon. In fact, you can almost make the case that they are trying to drive expectations in the other direction.”
To be fair, the Fed’s statement did advise that “some inflation risks remain” and so “additional firming that may be needed….”
But for the moment, warnings fall on deaf ears on Wall Street.

LIQUIDITY RULES

It’s too soon to declare that the Fed has once and forever stamped out the inflation embers, but it’s clear that the central bank has won the current battle.
The concern that consumer and producer prices would spiral upward while the Fed kept interest rates flat has been demoted, if not yet completely quashed, as a topical worry. The FOMC meets today and will likely declare that the price of money can remain as is. In sum, the debate that the liquidity unleashed in the recent past is about to show up in official inflation numbers is dead for the moment. But the thornier issues of deciding where all the liquidity went, where it will go, and what it means for future price trends remains alive and kicking.
In an earlier era, the hefty injection of liquidity into the U.S. economy that prevailed in the years after 2001 would have delivered more of an inflationary kick, as tracked by consumer price gauges. That hasn’t happened, but the reason has as much to do with deft central banking as it does with disinflationary and even deflationary winds blowing in the global economy.
The rise of emerging market economies in recent years, as The Economist points out this week, has been a major force for keeping broad measures of inflation relatively contained. As the survey asserts, emerging nations have delivered both a fresh and healthy dose of cheap labor and cheap capital to the world economy to a degree that’s unprecedented. In turn, prices for a number of goods and services, along with wages, have stayed lower than they might otherwise be in the U.S. and elsewhere.
The Fed and other central banks, as a result, have found it easier to keep interest rates lower and permit liquidity to rise higher than prudence might have allowed a generation ago. But while the liquidity production hasn’t come back to bite the economy, it’s had an impact. Where has all that liquidity been going? It’s not obvious, if one looks at the broad measures of inflation, as yesterday’s producer price index and last week’s consumer price report remind. But rest assured, the extra money the Fed has so generously printed has gone somewhere.
In the late-1990s, inflation arguably showed up in stock prices, which ran skyward. When the equity market collapsed in 2001 and 2002, cash found a new home in real estate. The bull market in housing in particular is said to be a boom of unprecedented proportions. Of course, that boom is now in the process of unwinding.
Liquidity has also migrated into emerging market economies, which hold 70% of the world’s foreign exchange reserves, according to The Economist’s latest world economy survey. That’s extraordinary for a number of reasons, starting with the fact that while the lion’s share of the planet’s reserves are in emerging economies, those nations represent less than 20% of the world’s stock market capitalization.
Imbalances are all the rage these days, and that extends to the extent that a large chunk of the liquidity held by the likes of China and India has migrated back to the United States in the form of funding of the country’s current account deficit via purchases of Treasuries and other assets.
If the past is any guide, however, excess liquidity is a transient form of capital. Expecting it stay put may be expecting the impossible. If so, what does the future hold when the liquidity seeks out greener pastures? It’s a timely question these days as some of the liquidity starts to come out of real estate and the global economy seems poised for a downshift in growth. Thus the question du jour: Where will liquidity go next? Perhaps it’ll flow back into real estate, or gravitate back to stocks, or work its way into the economy so that the general price indices start moving up after all. Or, maybe the liquidity will surprise everyone and foment repercussions that no one can yet imagine.
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke is on record as saying that the world has been awash with a global savings glut. That glut has been helpful to U.S. monetary policy so far. After Bernanke and company are done celebrating today, perhaps they might ponder if the global savings glut will continue to benefit the American economy, or if something might change.

ANOTHER GIFT FROM THE PRICING GODS

DUE TO A TECHNICAL GLITCH WITH OUR SERVER, WE WEREN’T ABLE TO PUBLISH UNTIL LATE THIS AFTERNOON. THE TECHNOLOGY GODS APPARENTLY ARE ANGRY WITH US. IN ANY CASE, HERE’S THE POST AS WRITTEN THIS MORNING…
Last week’s report on consumer prices for August was encouraging. This morning’s news on wholesale prices is even better.
Producer prices rose just 0.1% last month, the Labor Department announced. Subtracting food and energy from the mix revealed a core PPI that decline 0.4% in August. That’s the second month running that core PPI fell. Falling car and light truck prices were the main factors weighing on producer prices.
Coming just a day ahead of tomorrow’s FOMC meeting, today’s news will likely deliver the extra muscle to insure that the Fed keeps interest rates unchanged. In fact, traders are starting to nibble at Fed funds futures this morning, providing what may be a preview of anticipating a rate cut in October.
Helping raise the prospect of a rate cut down the road is the Commerce Department’s report this morning that housing starts dropped again to an annualized pace of 1.655 million–the slowest pace since April 2003. No one can doubt that real estate is now in the midst of something more than a temporary stumble.
Even so, the bond market apparently had the jitters yesterday, driving the yield on the 10-year Treasury up to nearly 4.85% at one point–the highest since late-August. But optimism has since returned, and in early trading this morning the 10-year’s yield is again fallen below 4.80%. By the end of the week, even lower yields are expected.
For the moment, the optimists and doves are heroes. Meanwhile, Bernanke’s star burns brighter this morning. Inflation is still a long-term enemy and the path of least resistance with a government and an economy that are hard wired to spend more than they take in. But such worries have been banished to the deepest recesses of Mr. Market’s collective mind.
The trend is said to be your friend. For the moment, there’s plenty of incentive to go with the flow.